A few years ago I saw my mom reading a book about the 1918 flu epidemic. I borrowed it from her, and got around to reading through it last summer. The book bogged down a bit in a few parts, but it was still interesting. (Did you know more soldiers died from the flu than were killed in action? Did you know that another flu epidemic is likely to strike in the next 20 years?) Even though I am not by any stretch of the imagination a "science person," I do enjoy a good book about diseases because I find the story of epidemics and plagues fascinating. Germs don't really scare me much, for whatever reason. Deep water, yes. Spiders, ohmygosh yes. Germs? Eh, not so much.
Because of my basic interest and knowledge of flu epidemics and such, I have kept up with news stories about the bird flu and other flu-ish outbreaks. I also have followed the media circus surrounding vaccinations. Just in the last several years, vaccinations have come under fire as a possible cause for autism. First it was the MMR vaccination that caused autism, but it turned out there wasn't sufficient evidence to support this claim. Then it was mercury in vaccinations that caused autism, but that wasn't fact either. Then it was the chickenpox vaccination, but no clear link there either.
If I needed further proof of the positives of vaccinations, I got it in the form of a new book that just came out last week. Parent Bloggers Network sent me a proof copy of Dr. Paul Offit's new book called Vaccinated: One Man's Quest to Defeat the World's Deadliest Diseases, which I just finished only moments ago (I started it several weeks ago and then homework fell from the heavens, so I couldn't get back to reading it until this weekend).
The story is about Maurice Hilleman, a scientist from Montana. Never heard of him? Have you heard of measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox, hep A, hep B, pneumococcus, meningoccus, and Hib? Hilleman is the guy who created vaccines to all these diseases. Yeah. Impressive.
Before Hilleman's death in April 2005, he told his story to Dr. Offit, resulting in this book that encompasses not only his life and professional career, but also the history of the field in which he was working. The narrative, while occasionally jumping awkwardly between direct quotes and explanatory prose, holds together as an informative and compelling story. It's no quick read, that's for sure, but it is well researched. And while the plot centers around Hilleman, there are lots of side-plots that bring in a considerable amount of the history of vaccinations--stories about Pasteur (rabies vaccine), Salk and Sabin (polio). If you're not really interested like I am in all the backstory and political shadows of vaccines, then the first three-fourths of the book might not catch your attention. But the final few chapters should be mandatory reading for anyone who questions whether or not vaccinations are necessary.
I know that there is a growing population of parents out there who don't want to vaccinate their kids, whether for personal or religious reasons. Even in my own Christian community, not many parents support the idea of giving teenage girls the papillomavirus vaccine, which prevents cervical cancer. And up until I read this book I thought, "Well, whatever. It's their kid." I effectively had no opinion on vaccinations.
This book changed my mind on that.
As I was reading about life in sub-Saharan Africa where most children aren't able to get vaccinated, the thought occurred to me that one of the reasons why I feel safe to take my young children out into society, allowing them to play with other children, is because I assume that those children have been vaccinated against some of the deadlier diseases. Certainly, I know that my kids aren't immune to all contagious diseases out there, but I don't imagine that they will catch measles. I don't worry about polio or diphtheria or mumps or smallpox. I don't worry about these diseases because with immunizations these are preventable diseases. But what about the kids who parents don't believe in immunizations? What about the parents who are willing to put my child's life in jeopardy for their personal beliefs? What about the parents who are essentially counting on every one else to immunize their children so that their own non-immunized kid won't get sick? When personal beliefs end up with very public results, yeah, well, I have opinions about that.
Sure, some kids have compromised immune systems and can't get vaccines. I get that. And I certainly understand the hesitancy to use new vaccines, especially if their pediatricians aren't recommending them. When I took Jules in for her Well Baby check a few weeks ago, I passed on one of the new vaccines (for a disease I hadn't heard of and don't remember) because our doctor said that it had just been rereleased after a decade-long FDA ban because the original version had nasty side-effects. My decision was also helped along because our doctor said he wasn't giving it to his daughter. Maybe this makes me a hypocrite, what with all my "vaccinate your kids" passion, but I guess the immunizations I feel most strongly about using are the ones that have been around for years.
At the end of the day, I'll definitely remember one of the final quotes from the book:
"Despite all of society's negative pressures, vaccination has proven itself beyond the shadow of a doubt to be the most logical way to control infectious diseases in a community.... The success story is undeniable. There is no measles, a little bit of mumps, no rubella, a little bit of hepatitis B in many communities. And the reason is vaccination.... But it's not free. It comes with a price, an imperative. And that is that you have to keep using it."
So, thumbs up on the book. And yay for Maurice Hilleman.

Right on! When Jason was a medical tech in the Air Force, he saw lots of parents struggle to watch their little babies get vaccinated. He and a friend of ours were the ones who were often tapped to do it, so when it was our son's turn, he and our friend were going to give the shots. Our friend asked me, "Does this bother you? Some moms cry and can't handle it." I stated that I firmly believe in doing what is best for my child and that means vaccinations. Thanks for sharing this information!
Posted by: Rachy | Monday, June 18, 2007 at 08:55 AM
But if your kid is already immunized, they won't catch the disease, right? Even if they run across a kid who isn't immunized, and has the disease? Or does it work differently than that? I am mostly for immunizations, especially the ones that have been around awhile. And like you, I'm not too concerned about germs.
Posted by: Amy | Monday, June 18, 2007 at 09:12 AM
Very educational. Thanks for doing the research. Might be a good MOPS topic.
Posted by: Becca | Monday, June 18, 2007 at 09:37 AM
I agree. I have a relative who stopped vaccinating her children after her 1-year-old got sick after a shot once. So that little girl has not had any subsequent immunizations, and her younger brother and sister are completely non-immunized. This really frustrates me, because like you said, the only reason they don't have to worry about the consequences of their decision (getting a serious illness) is because the rest of us are responsible and do get our children immunized. Like you said, sometimes personal beliefs can have public results.
Posted by: Jen | Monday, June 18, 2007 at 10:11 AM
Regarding Amy's comment...she's right that if our kids are immunized they won't contract those diseases. However, I was thinking of Jules who isn't old enough to have received all her vaccinations. She could still get whooping cough (can be serious) or chickenpox (not quite as serious).
Posted by: Stephanie | Monday, June 18, 2007 at 10:41 AM
Vaccinate your kids. Timely subject and so very important.
I actually had a teacher in college who contracted whooping cough from a non-immunized child. She was sick for 4 weeks, and upon her return to class, coughing for about 2 more months. It was serious. After seeing that, I knew how important it was to get children the vaccinations they need to be as healthy as possible.
Posted by: Leslie | Monday, June 18, 2007 at 10:52 AM
Thanks for sharing this. It can be eally confusing, what's right to do. If anything, I've considered spacing out the immunizations - getting them, but just a few at a time. I think it's all about doing research and being informed - as my husband says, somewhere BESIDES the Internet! But people should think about the rest of society - just like people should consider if they should take their sick/contagious kid to the nursery/day care/play group.
Posted by: Sam | Monday, June 18, 2007 at 11:56 AM
Stephanie,
Thanks for the informative post. I commend you for making a stand on vaccination. It is true that because of the majority of parents who vaccinate, there exists an option for those who may choose to NOT vaccinate their children. It just isn't fair to the rest of us (or those who are unable to or are too little to be vaccinated.) I work in the schools and this is a very real and very scary predicament that we're currently in. The benefits of vaccinating far outweigh the risks. People seem to have forgotten what a life post-polio infection can look like.
Posted by: Trezure | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:44 PM
This is good info Steph! Thanks for sharing! I my sef keep the kids immunized benefits out weighted the risks. But like you i'm rather skeptical on the newer vaccines.
Posted by: Priscilla Tilgner | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:31 PM
Speaking of vaccinations. Luke had to have four yesterday. Poor kid. He screamed and screamed. (Mostly because he felt that's what he HAD to do, he's kinda weird that way.) His leg was a little sore for the rest of the day. You know it just breaks my heart when they are sick, but shots...not so much. It's a few seconds of pain and free of serious disease the rest of the year. It's so worth it.
Posted by: Alida | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 09:33 AM
Well-put. I probably won't read the book but wholeheartedly agree. Peter's due for his 4-month shots next Wednesday-fun stuff! But that's why America is a great place to raise kids healthwise.
Posted by: Diana | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 06:00 PM
Thanks for the review. My daughter's just beginning to get her first few shots (there's quite a different schedule where we live), so I'm just beginning to look into this.
My grandma's brother died of whooping cough as an infant, which has really emphasized the importance of everyone being vaccinated to me (he caught it from their brother, who was toddler). Most vaccines aren't 100% effective. They tend to be 70%-80% effective at preventing the disease, and then kids who have been vaccinated against the disease but get it anyway typically get a milder form of the illness. It's the so-called "herd immunity" - the cumulative effect of most everyone being vaccinated - that fills in that 20%-30% gap and explains why people in our generation didn't usually know anyone with whooping cough - or polio or any of the other things we're vaccinated against.
Posted by: Meika | Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 11:23 PM
This is such a complicated issue. As a school registrar, I'm constantly checking vaccinations for all new enrollments. And, frankly, it surprises me a bit that these days more families don't opt out for personal or religious reasons (I see only a handful). But here's what complicates it for me: I work with someone who was raised in a faith that doesn't believe in them...and this woman, who is in her late 50's, is just about the healthiest, most vibrant woman I know. And there's a part of me that wonders if maybe not having vaccinations has contributed to that vibrancy.
Posted by: Marilyn | Thursday, July 19, 2007 at 05:46 PM